5 thoughts on “Employees will never speak in the company group. Why is this?”
Grady
Arrangement, layout, and communication in the group have become a way of working in modern workplace people. From the company’s large group to small groups, everyone’s mobile phones will have many work groups. But many employees rarely speak and interact in the work group. Why is this? I think there are roughly two reasons: 1. Since the work group is used as a platform for work communication, since it is a work group, its main function is to communicate about work, so many people only use the work group as work communication as job communication. The platform, simply used to receive tasks arranged by leaders, or publish some job information. If it is not an emergency, general employees will not talk and interact in the work group, let alone chat in the group. If the employee is not talking and interacting in the work group for this reason, then you should be happy as a leader, because your subordinate employees have the severity of work. If employees frequently interact in the work group and even chat, then they will undoubtedly waste a lot of time and have a negative impact on work. 2. There are leaders in the group who are embarrassed to speak and interact. Except for the above reasons, employees do not speak in the group, and there is a possibility that there are some leaders who are embarrassed to speak, for fear of saying something wrong in the group, letting the leader let the leader lead to the leader Display prejudice, or leave a bad impression on the leader. If employees do not speak and interact in the group, because there are leaders, then as a leader, you should reflect on his leadership style, because as a leader, although there must be a certain prestige inside the team, if it is too serious, it will cause employees to be employees. If you dare not make your own voice, it is not conducive to understanding the employees’ ideas, and it is not conducive to bringing a good team. In all, it may be a good phenomenon that employees do not speak and interact in the work group, but it may also be a bad phenomenon. If the employee just treats the work group as a platform for work communication and chooses to interact and chat in it, then this is a good phenomenon. But on the contrary, if employees do not speak in the group, because some leaders are embarrassed to speak, then this is a bad phenomenon, which is not conducive to the team building and integration.
Arrangement, layout, and communication in the group have become a way of working in modern workplace people. From the company’s large group to small groups, everyone’s mobile phones will have many work groups. But many employees rarely speak and interact in the work group. Why is this? I think there are roughly two reasons:
1. Since the work group is used as a platform for work communication, since it is a work group, its main function is to communicate about work, so many people only use the work group as work communication as job communication. The platform, simply used to receive tasks arranged by leaders, or publish some job information. If it is not an emergency, general employees will not talk and interact in the work group, let alone chat in the group.
If the employee is not talking and interacting in the work group for this reason, then you should be happy as a leader, because your subordinate employees have the severity of work. If employees frequently interact in the work group and even chat, then they will undoubtedly waste a lot of time and have a negative impact on work.
2. There are leaders in the group who are embarrassed to speak and interact. Except for the above reasons, employees do not speak in the group, and there is a possibility that there are some leaders who are embarrassed to speak, for fear of saying something wrong in the group, letting the leader let the leader lead to the leader Display prejudice, or leave a bad impression on the leader.
If employees do not speak and interact in the group, because there are leaders, then as a leader, you should reflect on his leadership style, because as a leader, although there must be a certain prestige inside the team, if it is too serious, it will cause employees to be employees. If you dare not make your own voice, it is not conducive to understanding the employees’ ideas, and it is not conducive to bringing a good team.
In all, it may be a good phenomenon that employees do not speak and interact in the work group, but it may also be a bad phenomenon. If the employee just treats the work group as a platform for work communication and chooses to interact and chat in it, then this is a good phenomenon. But on the contrary, if employees do not speak in the group, because some leaders are embarrassed to speak, then this is a bad phenomenon, which is not conducive to the team building and integration.
It may be embarrassed, or I may feel that my position is not particularly high, and there is no right to speak, so I will not interact in the group.
It may be because employees feel that they will be seen in the group. If they say something wrong, they will bring themselves a disaster.
Because the company’s group is a group of the boss’s mission, not a place to say gossip.
This can avoid many problems, will not interfere with the state of work, nor will it cover the news in the work group.